View Issue Details
ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0000662 | OpenMPT | Feature Request | public | 2015-03-12 06:41 | 2015-07-23 20:43 |
Reporter | goluigi | Assigned To | Saga Musix | ||
Priority | normal | Severity | feature | Reproducibility | N/A |
Status | resolved | Resolution | fixed | ||
Platform | x64 | OS | Windows | OS Version | 7 |
Product Version | OpenMPT 1.24.02.* (old testing) | ||||
Target Version | OpenMPT 1.25.01.00 / libopenmpt 0.2-beta13 (upgrade first) | Fixed in Version | OpenMPT 1.25.01.00 / libopenmpt 0.2-beta13 (upgrade first) | ||
Summary | 0000662: "ternary" row highlight | ||||
Description | I'm not sure what else to call this but it's not exactly like what it sounds I'll just put this picture here to show what i mean http://i.imgur.com/I1FdKlQ.png There should be an option to highlight like this consistently (the red rows are what will be highlighted, main row highlight+6 in this case) you cannot do this with secondary highlight because it has no relation to the primary row highlight. This would be useful for applications where you would want to convert an .it to a format (using another program) that does not really allow custom tempos and only allows speeds (pandatracker, zx spectrum tritone, etc) | ||||
Additional Information | I hope this explanation will suffice and the picture I linked will make it a bit more clear with what I'm talking about because it was worded really weirdly. | ||||
Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
Has the bug occurred in previous versions? | |||||
Tested code revision (in case you know it) | |||||
Having the secondary highlight reset together with the primary highlight might indeed be a good idea. |
|
well the secondary highlight is still good as it is, I just mean another highlight that resets together with the primary highlight |
|
like a "primary+" highlight where you can set that highlight to happen after a certain amount of rows on the primary highlight (ex: primary+6 highlight) |
|
Dunno, I don't really think that the secondary highlight's current behaviour is very practical at all? I mean, I never use time signatures where the secondary highlight is not a divider of the primary highlight, but I would guess that normally it should behave like you want it to behave? |
|
the secondary highlight is a good divider for like every "bar" but not good for subdividing beats (that's what i mean with ternary/primary+ highlight) |
|
I've modified the behaviour a bit so that both highlights reset at the start of a measure. http://sagagames.de/stuff/mptrack.exe |
|
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
---|---|---|---|
2015-03-12 06:41 | goluigi | New Issue | |
2015-03-12 12:03 | Saga Musix | Note Added: 0001987 | |
2015-03-12 22:14 | goluigi | Note Added: 0001994 | |
2015-03-12 22:16 | goluigi | Note Added: 0001995 | |
2015-03-12 22:17 | Saga Musix | Note Added: 0001996 | |
2015-03-13 05:08 | goluigi | Note Added: 0001997 | |
2015-07-07 15:33 | Saga Musix | Note Added: 0002098 | |
2015-07-07 15:33 | Saga Musix | Assigned To | => Saga Musix |
2015-07-07 15:33 | Saga Musix | Status | new => feedback |
2015-07-23 20:39 | Saga Musix | Note Edited: 0002098 | |
2015-07-23 20:43 | Saga Musix | Status | feedback => resolved |
2015-07-23 20:43 | Saga Musix | Resolution | open => fixed |
2015-07-23 20:43 | Saga Musix | Fixed in Version | => OpenMPT 1.25.01.00 / libopenmpt 0.2-beta13 (upgrade first) |
2015-07-23 20:43 | Saga Musix | Target Version | => OpenMPT 1.25.01.00 / libopenmpt 0.2-beta13 (upgrade first) |