"Follow song" has been turned off when starting a search for quite a while now. I think that after finding something in the pattern, you want to examine that finding, and not look at scrolling patterns. Everything else point be pointless. However, I think that "follow song" shouldn't be turned off when using "Replace All", but that's already done. Or do you have any better examples where "follow song" should be left turned on?

I don't do searches whilst playing back a module; so i'd prefer it to leave "follow song" alone, to be honest.

That's a good point! The flag should of course be left untouched if no song is actually playing.

Also worth noting; FINDing an instrument will update the patterndata list but not show you the correct order in the orderlist.. this may also be behavior by design but it confused me. When i do a "find" i would like the current/active row to go to what was found. i suppose this has turned into a setting feature request.

Or, if we're really wanting to capitalise on OMPT's multitasking abilities (playing back whilst editing something elsewhere in the same module) perhaps some kind of new window would be called for... opens up when a find/replace is called. It could split the patterndata portion of the pattern tab and have a different/offset color scheme. This way one could easilly see exactly where/what was going on during playback on one side, whilst also being able to tweak something on another side. -- though... i don't want to get TOO carried away here. ;) Though it seems if this kind of thing were implemented, it would make "Follow song" obsolete; as the "playback" portion of the window would have the active row centered (scrolling as it played) anyway, while the user would be quite free to move at will in the editing portion; only occasionally seeing the playback bar whiz by as the tracker came to play the pattern said user was working on... lol. OK.. that's enough for now. :)

Regarding comment 0000626, that happens because Find/Replace goes through the pattern from the first pattern to the last pattern; not from the first order item to the last order item; i.e. it is currently "agnostic" of where in the order list the finding is. It is well possible that the pattern something was found in isn't in the order list at all! Sure this can be improved, let's see what can be done...

This should be fixed in revision 1208.

Don't see any update just yet (which is no problem, i realise it might not be completed and/or ready for testing) -- so hope the timing of this comment is good -- on find/replace, the setting for "Show Prev/Next patterns" is temporarilly ignored/disabled, until another pattern is selected from the ordlist (or upon playback progressing to the next pattern in the orderlist -- IF follow song is on). First opportunity i get with the next build i shall make haste to bring feedback to this and the other recent issues. :D As always, you da man j0jo! Thanks.

[edit -- d'OH! found the updated version.. i'll go test what's been reported and post feedback post haste.]

Reg'd comment 627 -- do you think such would make a useful feature? Enough so that i ought make a feature request for it? i know it'd be quite a while till it shows up -- i just dunno if others might find it useful or not (at all). For me, it wouldn't make a bit of difference since i don't simultaneously play and edit tracks.. but i'm an oddball.. so.. :P

What of a feature to either show (or at least list) patterns containing data which aren't present in the ordlist? (again -- not useful to me, but you did bring up the point..). Currently as i understand it -- the only way to see/edit such a pattern would be to (temporarilly, perhaps) add it back into the ordlist. Again, i don't know if these are useful or trivial.

SLICK -- you either noticed the "Show Prev/Next patterns" thing in-code or saw my note and fixed it prior to (or without) comment! The original issue is also fixed and i like the update to select the pattern in the ordlist (if it's there..) in FINDs as well. :)

i typically do not use patterns that don't in some way appear in my ordlists so i haven't tested functionality in that scenario. However, i'm sure with these modifications that the intended behavior would also apply in that case.

SLICK -- you either noticed the "Show Prev/Next patterns" thing in-code or saw my note and fixed it prior to (or without) comment!

Reg'd comment 627 -- do you think such would make a useful feature?