View Issue Details
ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0001422 | OpenMPT | Feature Request | public | 2021-02-22 16:46 | 2023-01-23 17:41 |
Reporter | sincx | Assigned To | |||
Priority | normal | Severity | feature | Reproducibility | N/A |
Status | new | Resolution | open | ||
Platform | x64 | OS | Windows | OS Version | 10 |
Product Version | OpenMPT 1.30.00.* (old testing) | ||||
Summary | 0001422: Fadeout option when rendering | ||||
Description | Currently to my knowledge MPT has no simple way of exporting songs that loop with a fadeout without adding a fadeout pattern to the module itself. Therefore, I think it would be nice to have the option when rendering to MP3/WAV/etc to set an optional fadeout length for the export. I haven't extensively thought through what it could look like UI-wise, but maybe a checkbox + input field similar to the "Limit song length" field? So for example I would be able to choose "play entire song 2 times" and select a fadeout length of 10 seconds and I'd end up with a render that plays the full loop twice and then 10 seconds of a third loop fading out. | ||||
Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
Has the bug occurred in previous versions? | |||||
Tested code revision (in case you know it) | |||||
You might also consider an option to delete silence at the end. |
|
Bump. Wxx is still useful for compability and if you want to force how the module should be played. But fade-out in stream-export is useful if you're making streamed music with OpenMPT and want looped music with a clean fade-out, as Wxx fades out the linear global volume in steps, which can be heard especially in the lower volumes. It also saves time in compo-context as the Wxx-method is a bit slower, whereas you have to duplicate the "loop-start" pattern and flood-paste Wxx, or do a trick with Wxx in the loop-start pattern and make it start fading once the song loops. |
|
There's so many possible parameters to change here (duration, fade curve, etc.) that I think it makes more sense to do these sort of operations in a dedicated sample editor (or the built-in sample editor if 16-bit resolution is sufficient). Makes it much easier to review and potentially re-do the change, too. |
|
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
---|---|---|---|
2021-02-22 16:46 | sincx | New Issue | |
2021-04-02 12:31 | sqrmax | Note Added: 0004698 | |
2023-01-22 11:37 | ASIKWUSpulse | Note Added: 0005492 | |
2023-01-23 17:41 | Saga Musix | Note Added: 0005493 |