View Issue Details
ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0000386 | OpenMPT | Playback Compatibility | public | 2013-04-28 03:16 | 2013-05-20 15:48 |
Reporter | mrbumpy409 | Assigned To | Saga Musix | ||
Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | always |
Status | resolved | Resolution | fixed | ||
Platform | x86 | OS | Windows | OS Version | XP |
Product Version | OpenMPT 1.22.02.00 (upgrade first) | ||||
Target Version | OpenMPT 1.22.04.00 (upgrade first) | Fixed in Version | OpenMPT 1.22.04.00 (upgrade first) | ||
Summary | 0000386: incomplete sample playback in "Pondering on the Past" by Lesnik (XM module) | ||||
Description | In the XM module "Pondering on the Past" by Lesnik, It seems that OpenMPT only plays part of the sample that is played on channel 24 in pattern 23. Linked below is a .zip file containing comparison audio between FastTracker 2 and OpenMPT as well as the original XM module file. XMPlay's playback matches that of FastTracker 2. Disabling the FastTracker 2 compatible playback mode in OpenMPT doesn't solve the problem. | ||||
Steps To Reproduce |
| ||||
Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
Has the bug occurred in previous versions? | I don't know. | ||||
Tested code revision (in case you know it) | |||||
How the hell did you find that one? It's practically not noticeable when playing the tune. Anyway, this is really funny, FT2 wraps around the frequency once it gets too low... |
|
The reason I'm able to find such subtle bugs is because I am working on a tracker music remastering project. I'm currently going through about 277 XM modules, creating recordings using both OpenMPT and XMPlay. Then I compare the recordings back-to-back in Audacity, using the simple solo mode to toggle frequently between the recordings while listening for any differences. If there are any differences, I then check to see what FastTracker does in that instance. Being able to toggle so quickly between the recordings during playback makes even very subtle differences stand out. That being said, recordings from OpenMPT and XMPlay sound identical on the majority of XM files, so OpenMPT's FastTracker II compatibility already seems to be quite good. For my project, I prefer using the OpenMPT recordings in general, because I can set the ramping in to 10 samples for nice, punchy drums. The ramping in XMPlay (and even FastTracker II) can occasionally cause the drums to sound a bit "squishy". |
|
Gee, this one was really mind-boggling. Should be fixed now: http://buildbot.openmpt.org/builds/latest-unpacked/mptrack.exe |
|
Indeed, it is fixed :) |
|
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
---|---|---|---|
2013-04-28 03:16 | mrbumpy409 | New Issue | |
2013-04-28 15:13 | Saga Musix | Note Added: 0001209 | |
2013-04-29 15:24 | mrbumpy409 | Note Added: 0001239 | |
2013-05-19 20:46 | Saga Musix | Note Added: 0001269 | |
2013-05-19 20:46 | Saga Musix | Assigned To | => Saga Musix |
2013-05-19 20:46 | Saga Musix | Status | new => feedback |
2013-05-19 20:46 | Saga Musix | Target Version | => OpenMPT 1.22.04.00 (upgrade first) |
2013-05-20 15:46 | mrbumpy409 | Note Added: 0001270 | |
2013-05-20 15:46 | mrbumpy409 | Status | feedback => assigned |
2013-05-20 15:48 | Saga Musix | Status | assigned => resolved |
2013-05-20 15:48 | Saga Musix | Resolution | open => fixed |
2013-05-20 15:48 | Saga Musix | Fixed in Version | => OpenMPT 1.22.04.00 (upgrade first) |